Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:12

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How can I get a girlfriend? I am 26.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Porn Ban Warning For Millions Of iPhone And Android Users - Forbes
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Who’ll be the odd man out in the Cleveland quarterback battle? - NBC Sports
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
End of an era: Space Launch Complex 37 gets demolished - Spectrum News 13
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Europe stock markets open lower; FTSE 100 choppy after UK economy shrinks more than expected - CNBC